Showing posts with label Mel Crawford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mel Crawford. Show all posts

Friday, May 23, 2008

More BG Layout Notes - HIERARCHY of Form and Composition



BG Layout artists, or the persons who will help me design the main scenes and setups will have to be able to draw a variety of types of forms, and use some basic principles of design and composition to make the scenes compose well with the characters.

The BGs should provide an instantly readable organic environment for characters to play out their stories.

Hopefully some of these qualities below will help you see what I am aiming for:

TREES - Build Trees out of overall forms, don't start with the details.


Each of these trees has an interesting overall form. Even the foliage is contained in a form; it's not a mess of random leaves.



When you go outside, squint your eyes when looking at trees. Try to see the form of the tree, rather than getting lost and confused in the details of leaves, bark and branches.



Each kind of tree has its own unique plan, and each member of each kind of tree has its own unique variation on the same overall plan.


Buildings/Cars- Man Made Organic Geometry
Man-made objects, such as houses and machines are made of simpler more geometric forms than nature's forms, but to be well-designed, they still have to have appealing, solid forms.

And, they also have to have variety in the shapes, details, textures, arrangement of forms.

Lots of negative shapes!

Composition. The biggest forms in the picture have to make the overall statement instantly. A viewer shouldn't be distracted by a lot of cluttered details and an absence of negative shapes.

What details there are should be much smaller than the bigger forms they help describe. They wrap around the bigger shapes- going in the same directions. Not in a strictly 100% mathematical way. there should be very slight organic imperfections, but not so much that they destroy the forms they are part of.




The bricks, windows etc. on the walls below are not drawn with a ruler; there are no 100% parallel lines. Edges have slight curves. Not all the shapes mirror each other.

The details are not evenly spaced apart.

The background is composed to make the character read easily in his environment.

This is the kind of thoughtful control I would like in the layouts of my cartoons. No haphazard wonky flat modern look.

Stylish but planned.

A car is more organic than a house, but still has an overall form, and again: the details wrap around the form. They don't go off in their own directions.
The door follows the form of the side of the car, the lines on the seats follow the shape of the seats, etc.
Nature - Organic Forms, but still forms
Good BG design makes the largest forms in the picture make a statement: a controlled purposeful instantly readable composition.

The details are less important.
The details follow the same perspective and physics as the larger forms.

Not all areas of detail are filled equally. There are sparse areas or completely empty areas.

THE DETAILS ARE MUCH SMALLER THAN THE LARGER FORMS

This is so important. If the details get too large, or stick out of the silhouettes of the larger forms, they make it harder to see an overall form.
This Frazetta drawing looks elaborate and detailed, but follows the same ideas and planning of the more cartoony art above. All the little details - the bark texture, the moss, the flowers and mushrooms are much smaller than the twisted solid tree root. The tree root is the important graphic statement.

If the details were too large, or didn't flow around the root, or stuck out of the silhouette of the root more, you wouldn't feel or see the root so clearly.

There are sparser areas of detail on the root-between the areas of moss, for example.

I don't need anything this detailed in my cartoons, but the principles are what I am after.

The big picture should be solid, interesting and instantly readable as what it is - and not get in the way of the characters..

HARVEY EISENBERG APPLIES ALL THESE IDEASHIERARCHY OF FORMS AND COMPOSITION
APPEALING SHAPES
NEGATIVE AREAS
DETAILS FOLLOW FORMS

A VARIETY OF FORMS AND TEXTURES

ALL COMPLETELY CONTROLLED TO MAKE AN EASY TO READ FUN PICTURE

SO DOES MEL CRAWFORD
STYLE WITH CONTROL


Monday, July 23, 2007

Mel Crawford - cartoon painting genius

I can't even imagine how someone can be this talented and skilled.
Awesome!

Here's a guy who doesn't cheat at all. He just knows how to draw and paint for real.


Mel Crawford is a genius children's illustrator. The guy can do all kinds of different styles!



I'm not positive that every one of the rest of these are his but they sure look like it to me.
Anyway, they are really beautiful...and fun at the same time.

Isn't this one great? Now these are some cute rodents!



Mel is the best Hanna Barbera painter for sure.

http://inspiration-grab-bag.blogspot.com/2006/03/mel-crawford-pebbles-flintstone-1963.html

http://inspiration-grab-bag.blogspot.com/2006/01/mel-crawford-magilla-gorilla-big.html


http://fun-all-around.blogspot.com/2006/04/yogi-bear-and-cranky-magician.html



http://fun-all-around.blogspot.com/2005/12/mel-crawford-rootie-kazootie.html


To young cartoonists: Here's why I keep saying, don't learn a style. Learn to draw well! Then you can work in many different styles without cheating!

Styles come and go. Skill is always useful and will keep you in demand.

Learn your old fashioned principles!

Thanks to Trevour for this contribution:

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Cereal Character Displays by Mel Crawford

at least I think they are by Mel. http://www.animationarchive.org/2006/04/media-mel-crawfords-rootie-kazootie.html
Here're the same characters done in a quicker style by Mel:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/91502146@N00/43694823/


My BG painters have to from time to time paint characters in a cartoony rendered style. This isn't so easy. It seems like you have to have a knack for it. Some of my painters are great at it.

There were a lot of illustrators back in the 50s and 60s who turned character paintings into an art form.
There are lots of styles to do it in. This particular one is really charming, I think.

Note that they aren't over rendered. The shadows are not in logical places either. They are just put down artistically where the artist thinks they will help define the shapes (because there are no cartoon lines bordering the character you need to separate things somehow) and where they look good and FUN.

FUN and CLEAN are two important elements of cartoon character paintings. If you get over rendered and muddy or too realistic, it defeats the purpose.

Golden books are full of great character paintings and so are the covers of old coloring books.
http://inspiration-grab-bag.blogspot.com/2006/01/mel-crawford-magilla-gorilla-big.html


I'm always on the lookout for painters who can do this sort of thing, so if you are planning to be a cartoon illustrator/painter, it would be good to copy these and glean the techniques.

You can find all kinds of cool old cartoon packaging art at this great site:

http://theimaginaryworld.com/disp.html

Monday, February 05, 2007

A Mel Crawford Puzzle To Tide You Over

Kali found this Mel Crawford puzzle at a flea market yesterday and scanned it for you.

I have a huge post about 40s animation principles coming up, but I've been busy finishing up some new Raketu cartoons so don't have time to polish it up.

I don't wanna rush the construction post. The 40s is my favorite decade for everything and especially animation. There is so much to cover and I know if I leave something out you will yell at me. "But what about Astro Boy!!!? You bum!"

So in the meantime I put up a puzzle for you.

AND KALI HAS MORE!
http://kalikazoo.blogspot.com/2007/02/more-mel-crawford-puzzles.html

Sunday, December 24, 2006

Random Golden Book Stuff

Look how much fun kids used to have. Have you seen what the drawings look like in kids' books today?http://www.illustrationweb.com/style_gallery.asp?gallery_id=5

Here's two Disney books. One's from the late 40s and the other's from the 60s. The Cub Scouts is painted in a soft warm style and the 60s in a sharper cooler style. You can find tons more Mickey and Donald books all painted in different styles. Here's two giants: Tenggren and Crawford.
http://www.childscapes.com/bookpages/tenggren.html

http://inspiration-grab-bag.blogspot.com/2006/03/mel-crawford-pebbles-flintstone-1963.html

http://inspiration-grab-bag.blogspot.com/2006/01/mel-crawford-magilla-gorilla-big.html
I'm not sure who painted this, and it's not a Golden Book, it's a similar type of book-maybe Whitman's Tell-a-tales.
I like the weird puppet-dog.



Sorry, nothing mind-blowing today. I'm still shopping for last minute gifts.