SPECIFIC VERSUS GENERIC RUBBER HOSE CARTOONS
I used to not like rubber hose cartoons because I thought they were primitive, and in some technical senses they are, compared to what the same animators did in the 1940s.
They didn't have color, lines of action, construction, everyone tended to move the same, not much characterization...etc.
This was true for most of the studios in the early 30s, but one studio more than made up for all these early limitations-The Fleischers'.
The cartoons they made from 1929 to 1933 were so creative and so resisitant to formula and rules that they stand to this day as some of the most creative and fun cartoons ever made.
By contrast the Disney cartoons of the same period are extremely generic, bland and boring.
Disney himself was such a conservative guy in his tastes that while he kept advancing technical skill, he resisted imagination and creativity.
I honestly don't know how he survived to the mid 30s with the cartoons he was making in the early 30s.

His characters are all pretty much circles and hoses and made up of mathematical proportions.
The Fleischers had a much wider range of character designs and they were hip and they used the biggest jazz stars of the day to do much of their music. Plus they were bawdy and honest. They liked dirty jokes -even rape jokes! They liked funny stuff and surrealism and wanted to please their audience.
Look. somehow the Fleischers can make circles look funny!

Look. somehow the Fleischers can make circles look funny!

Disney was always a square.
The Fleischers, interestingly were in New York in the early days, along with Van Beuren and Terrytoons. All these studios early on followed their own whims and weren't swept along by the Disney influence that dominated the Hollywood cartoon studios. Not till later and that was their downfall.
To Disney, "more" meant "better". He was going to make his cartoons have more characters, more details in the backgrounds, more colors, more more more.
Anybody have a frame grab of a hugely elaborate scene from an early Disney cartoon I can use as an illustration?
Disney was kind of an average guy except for his ambition. Most regular folk will look at a highly detailed drawing full of cross-hatching or lots of tiny smooth brush strokes and be impressed. "Wow, that painting looks like a photo! Now that's talent!" That's how Disney thought. Disney himself was a cartoonist but not a very good one.
He was also a guy who loved rules and formulas. He wanted everything to be controlled and symmetrical. He needed reasons for everything. Where rules didn't exist, he and his artists invented them. There's a whole book documenting this called "The Illusion Of Life" written by 2 of his animators, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston. It actually brags about how the studio took the cartooniness out of cartoons.

Rare instance of a funny drawing in a Disney Cartoon
Walt must have been on vacation when this scene was animated!


Popeye funny and kinda gross and full of personality
In Hollywood most of the cartoon studios of the early 30s copied Disney's blandness. In fact many of the studios were founded by Disney animators.Ub Iwerks-who was Disney's top animator in the early days started his own studio and managed to make some fun stuff.
Harman and Ising founded Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies and introduced Bosko and the first talking cartoon. Interestingly, the first few Boskos were very creative, bawdy, funny and had a variety of drawing styles in them, but soon they became standardized and one was drawn about the same as the last.
Disney started the idea that each animator should draw the characters the same way and it became harder to tell one animator from the next. I think this was a huge setback for cartoons, because many animators have strong individual styles and if encouraged to showcase them can add a lot of fun and entertainment to the cartoons. Many later Disney animators were cast according to the way they move things but were still made to keep the characters as "on-model" or generic as they could.
Luckily Tex Avery and Bob Clampett soon took over the creative direction of the Looney Tunes studio. They saved it from being just another bland Disney clone. Most of the other studios tried to become fake Disneys- while dying in the process.
SOME BASIC CARTOON LOGIC OF THE 30S
Whether bland or boring or thrilling and creative all 30s cartoons shared some fundamental good things.Number 1: all the animators timed their work to music. At first they did it very mechanically-right to the beat, but as they got better their timing became more sophisticated and by the 40s, even non-musical cartoons have an invisible meter going all the time and this automatically makes the cartoons feel good.
http://www.animationarchive.org/2006/04/filmography-al-falfas-prize-package.html
The rubber hose style and the moving to the beats was the greatest way for animators to learn. Drawing simple shapes allowed the animators to learn the fundamental principles of movement without being bogged down with all the time it takes to draw useless details. Doing this to music gave them a great sense of timing. Doing it without a lot of control from non-cartoonists allowed the process of inventing animated cartoons to happen naturally through trial and error. It caused the techniques and the art of animation to grow at the fastest rate of any artform in history.
From 1928 to 1940 the medium went from stick figures to the greatest cartoons ever made. Through the 40s the momentum slowed down a bit but continued in a forward direction. The 50s started a decline.
In the 60s cartoons crashed, non-cartoonists stole the medium from us and we have never again been able to get back on a forward moving path for any prolonged period of time.
The advances in technical aspects of animation through the late 30s brought with it an unfortunate by-product. Many of the animators-especially Disney- wanted to leave behind the best attributes of the early cartoons.
There was one cartoon director of the 40s that really preserved the good points of the rubber hose cartoons while taking advantage of all the advances in cartoon techniques. Bob Clampett.
He continued making his cartoons to music and did it better than anyone from the late 30s till today. He kept the silly, surreal impossible cartooniness of the earliest cartoons and added the squash and stretch, line of action and pear shapes that developed at Disney and on top of all that, he added strong and specific personality to the characters.
Warner Bros. pioneered the idea of cartoons having the director's individual personality stamped onto them. Clampett took it a step further by giving each of the characters a living breathing presence. He added the personality and supreme performances.
More on the 40s later.
Thanks to Max and Clarke and especially Marc for helping me out!






85 comments:
this is best website ever. Thank you John
Calling the classic Disney cartoons bland and borring???? Know wonder people say your past your prime.
>> Know wonder people say your past your prime.
Luckily the people who say it usually can't spell.
You won't find this in any history textbook, that's for sure. Thanks for the article!
I went to the Art Institute to study animation. I didn't learn much from my "disney" dean, and reading illusion of life; the history of disney and 9 old men. Animator's Survival Kit by R.Williams helped me understand rubber hose, and the 40s "screwball" style I love most of all. But John, not all of Disney's classic cartoons were boring. Classic donald duck was the only entertaining character at the time.
I think one of the main reasons Disney thrived and kept growing was the simple reason of Mickey Mouse being a loveable character to the masses.
I agree that the Fleischer cartoons were funnier and did more wild stuff (content and technique-wise), but I still thoroughly enjoy the old Disney shorts, even if they were more conservative under Walt's direction.
While I'm a fan of most early Disney shorts (mostly earlier Donalds), I lose less interest as the years go on... by the mid/late '40s, the Disney cartoons were getting too complicated and literally contained zero humor at all. Nothing zany whatsoever... they were all real-life situations where the inconvenience or hardship that the main character experienced was the comedy. I can't think of a specific scene, but I'm sure somebody knows what I'm talking about. I suppose that's a topic for a later post!
John,
Thanks so much for writing these articles. I've been a animation fan for years - from the classics you discuss here up to the 1990's, including all of your work that I've seen.
I'm learning a lot from your writings - it's great to read the analysis from someone who's in the industry.
Oh, and is that Larry the Lion on your shelf in the photos? Brings back some good memories.
Thanks for the interesting reading.
Chris
John, I heard that Bob Clampett was a crazy fellow.
You've been with him on vacations, what kinds of crazy / funny things did he do ?
_Eric
Killer comeback for commenter #2 John.
Anxiously awaiting the next parts.
Great article.
Boy I wish the audio wasn't out of synch in that Toby the Pup cartoon. I wonder why so many clips on Youtube have that problem.
Mickey was a simple happy perservering character which I think was what a lot of people wanted during the depression. Disney did a great job marketing and promoting Mickey Mouse even in the early 30's. I should make a clip of Mickey singing "When I hear my little Minnie go YOO-HOO" in Mickey's Follies which is what that weird drawing of Mickey is from, it's beautifully animated.
GREAT POST! I currently feel the same way about rubbethose, but I love Popeye, as I said. I gotta check out some more Fleischer.
What clips did John post? All I see is a red x.
Another great and incredibly educational post John. thanks for taking the time to give away all of these golden nuggets of onsight for free here on your blog.
Speaking of Clampett rubber hose cartoons... One of my all time favorite cartoons as a kid was Clampett's "The Daffy Doc" I haven't seen it in God nows how many years, and I'd love to hear your analysis of it in relation to these latest post topics John.
From what I remember it was an incredibly wacky ultra-fast paced gag-fest with Porky and Daffy as they were meant to be portrayed.
Maybe someone can upload it to you tube for us? Pretty please...
Great post. I agree that this is the best animation blog around, bar none. Perhaps because we're afraid of dissolving the legacies of the field, everyone seems to be afraid to criticize the 'gods.' Did you just swipe at *The* Walt Disney? But he's objectively perfect; everyone knows that!
I think that the East Coast/West Coast animation distinction of the 1930s has a strangely Freudian "anal/oral" dichotomy. Disney was clearly an anal dude--there are anecdotes documenting his fecal obsessions, and his personality (an intense desire for distinct order and comprehensibility) seems to be consonant with this idea. Disney animation is, as John stated, excessively rule- and formula-driven, but sometimes beautiful because of it.
The oral east-coast animation is indulgent, sometimes sloppy, and hellbent on breaking established rules.
They're both cool.
Don't kill me for saying this, but I liked some really early Disney. Sure, they were blandly animated, but they were still hilarious.
Mickey was always abusing animals and giving Minnie wedgies and stuff. Everything was violent and pointless and fun.
Then Mickey turned into a sappy do-gooder and it all went to crap.
Looney Tunes and Fleischers were far better in every respect, I agree, but I don't think really early Disney (1928 to around 1931) was all that terrible.
Great stuff! I wonder if Disney's triumph over the other studios had more to do with distribution (reaching more viewers) or being "safe" and not so racey?
I worked on a Disney related project once. They were incredibly anal about how to draw Mickey and staying on model. We decided to look over a bunch of old Disney commercials and found a crazy 'cubist' style Mickey from a 50's TV commercial. We were so excited to see something diffrent! Sadly, they wouldn't let us use it, even though it was an "offical" Disney design.
The Loony Toons that john posted was incredible. It's a shame that many of these are banned from TV. I'm curious what everyone else thinks:
would you call the way blacks are depicted in these cartoons "racist?" or is it simply a cartoon being a cartoon.
My opinion is that everything is suppose to be exaggerated to make it look funnier. EVERYONE looks silly in the cartoon world. I don't find these racist; in fact many of these cartoons seem embrace the African American culture.
John, what do you think of the Silly Symphonies? Are there any specific ones you remember as being more groudbreaking or influential? Didn't the OLD MILL win an oscar or something?
It's clear you are't the worlds biggest Disney fan but it seems you have a certain level of respect for him. I remember hearing that Silly Symphonies were the most groundbreaking cartoons to come out at the time, but then again i think I read this on an advertisement for the DVD set.
Hey John,
These are really good articles. Me and the rest of all the wanna-be cartoonist are lucky to have these articles. God damnit John, I am going to work for you one day.
Hey John, thanks for posting Tin Pan Alley Cats. I had never seen that cartoon before.
I noticed that some of the scenes were also used in Porky in Wackyland. Which cartoon came first?
I have to agree with some of these guys that the early Disney stuff had a violent, perverse sense of humor. "Steamboat Willie" is even a little disturbing in the scene where Mickey is gleefully stamping on the cat and swinging it around by the tail. The cartoons where Mickey is a total asshole are pretty fun to watch.
I'm surprised you mentioned the Fleischer "Snow White" cartoon without mentioning the most awesome scene in it--the "St. James Infirmary" bit sung by Cab Calloway, featuring an amazing melding of rotoscope and surreal rubber hose.
>>I should make a clip of Mickey singing "When I hear my little Minnie go YOO-HOO" in Mickey's Follies which is what that weird drawing of Mickey is from, it's beautifully animated.
If you do, let me know and I'll link to it!
That's my favorite Disney cartoon. I also like those 50s commercials where Tom Oreb drew the characters all "cubist" as someone here described them.
>> Delete
Eric C. said...
John, I heard that Bob Clampett was a crazy fellow.
You've been with him on vacations, what kinds of crazy / funny things did he do ?<<
Well I never stayed in the same room with him, but yes he was a really funny guy. He was sometimes Bugs Bunny and other times Daffy Duck.
He was a walking talking Looney Tune in real life.
Brother, I like your blog more and more.
I agree with you about Disney's blandness, but I gotta say that many of the Fleisher characters were really unpleasant. Hunky and Spunky? Yikes. Famous was even worse... Herman the mouse was about the gnarliest, unfunniest of all of 'em. WB had the most likable set, all in all... even the heavies were fairly cool.
It's funny, because now at the local Wal-Mart you can buy these huge DVD collections of random cartoons from the 30's, 40's and 50's. There seemsto be no rhyme or reason to the assortment, with Noveltoons next to Superman and 3 Stooges. It's great to see such excellent animation, but I'm appalled at the laziness of the story and character departments. It seems that my favorites arusually the characters that are consistent and consistently engaging. I especially like it when the story situations bring out more in the characters. As you once said, "Ren's an asshole and Stimpy's an idiot," but nobody who has seen more than one episode would say that that's all there is to it.
Great stuff John.
Fleischer's early 30's shorts are more fun than Disney, but I think what Disney was doing in the early 30's is much better than what the Fleishcer studio did in the late 30's.
Fleischer went into a decline in the late 30's with his dull and sappy Color Classics. Do you think the reason that they aren't as fun as his earlier shorts is that the Color Classics were trying too much to be like Disney's Silly Symphonies, when the earlier shorts weren't Disney at all?
Thanks for this post John! I enjoy reading your take on classic cartoons. I do enjoy some of those early Mickey shorts where he drinks beer, smokes and punches stuff... you know before he had the life sucked out of him. Overall I agree that Fleischer Studio did much better and more entertaining work from that era. I still find tons of inspiration from the early Betty Boop shorts.
John,
I agree with Eddie's earlier comment about these being the best posts so far. I'm really learning a lot about these great cartoons. That halloween cartoon was pretty insane, and insanely creative.
Do you think you'll ever do a tribute to rubber hose? I know that games did that poopy cartoon where Stimpy is an animator, and you said that was originally was supposed to be your tribute. It'd be tight to see your interpretation.
-Rob
What about Bimbo's initiation, or Small Fry , or crazy town, I would love to here your thoughts on those cartoons.
>>What about Bimbo's initiation, or Small Fry , or crazy town, I would love to here your thoughts on those cartoons.<<
I love them all, especially the butt slapping dance at the end of Bimbo's Initiation!
Wow, this was wonderful! Thanks for all the great, inspiring info.
:)
With each post you scale new heights - thank you, Mr. K.
Hey here's an interesting fact:
Tin Pan Alley Cats uses a bunch of animation from an earlier Friz cartoon-I can't remember the name-help me out!
But the same footage is way more fun and used better to the music in Bob's cartoon than in Friz'.
You can tell which scenes-the more primitive looking ones-the fat girl dancing, the bartenders mixing the drinks above their heads, some of Cats Waller playing the piano.
Ironic?
Another interesting fact: Famous Disney animator Art Babbit (the mushroom dance and the early Goofy animation) animated some scenes-the first scene of the scat singer and Cats Waller floating in the air wailing "Send me outta this world".
They are the most generically drawn and animated scenes in the new footage.
Hey John.
Ever heard of Shamus Culhane? He worked at Fleischer's in the early days, and later went to Disney. He wrote a book called Talking Animals and Other People. It's a great book to read, and he tells everyone what an asshole Walt Disney was.
P.S. This is your BEST blog yet!!!
John, when are you going to do a book on the history of animation? It would be great. The ones I remember reading (when I was 10-12 yrs old... and this was 20 years ago) were done by movie critics.
Hey John K.
How do you feel about the old Oswald The Rabbit cartoons?
Jesse
Hey here's an interesting fact:
Tin Pan Alley Cats uses a bunch of animation from an earlier Friz cartoon-I can't remember the name-help me out!
Porky in Wackyland as well. Wish I knew the Friz toon though.
John, I admire your passion for animation and cartoons, but I can't help but think that your vision of it is very one-sided.
The rubber hose cartoons look weird and scary!
>>John, I admire your passion for animation and cartoons, but I can't help but think that your vision of it is very one-sided.<<
I don't know. I've already lauded and analyzed tons of different cartoon styles that are barely even mentioned in the animation history books. I would conclude the opposite if I were you.
There's lots more to come too. I've barely started.
John, I love the site!
I wish the powers that be would study and wisen up!
Silly question, Did you ever interview Bob Clampett?
I have the Beany and Cecil DVD and it still just isn't enough BoB!
Thanks for giving me something worthwhile and valuable to do at my survival job, I have learned more this week than in a long time. It's entertaining and I feel like I actually learn stuff. I'm actually INTERESTED in the subject. If only you had been teaching or lecturing at the art academy I went to I wouldn't have dropped out.
it looks like your heavy bandwidth use is killing blogger and youtube.
oh yea forgot to mention.
The only Disney ones I like are the REALLY old ones where everything isn't anally perfect yet and they were still searching and experimenting and raw and rude! Yes!! after that it just went downhill. I think in cartoons it's usually characters with an edge about them I like best. In movies too, now I think of it. Nothing off and askew scares the shit out of me.
Wow really interesting that Tin Pan Alley Cats would use Friz animation. Too bad youtube is down right now.
I've also noticed that most of Friz Freling's early rubber hose cartoons were tighter than than what everyone else was doing at the time.
The rubber hose cartoons always made me feel uneasy as a child. Can't explain it rationally, but there was something a little too freaky about them for my little mind.
Here are a couple examples of Disney cheating with symmetry in early cartoons.
Example 1
Example 2
I really love these. The cannibals, the popey, all so interesting and strange.
R2K
This is a really nice summation of the path from chaos to boredom, and the road not taken out of it! Keep it up. Edit all this stuff into a book once you've got enough; loosely-related essays would be fine. I'd buy it!
I can't remember ever not liking rubber hose cartoons. Maybe it's how I came to them - my first contact was reading about them in Mice and Magic. Glowing descriptions of some of the best Fleischer work made me want to seek them out, but this was damn near impossible for a six-year-old kid in the seventies. When I finally did come in contact with them, I was old enough to look past the shitty transfers and the B&W and see the raw joy of the things. I think it was when I was in animation school that I finally got access to a tape of the best Betty Boops, stuff I'd been waiting to see for years, and it was worth the wait.
I still wonder what animation would have been like if the Fleischers had made features that were full of the same things that made the their 30s shorts great, instead of falling into the trap of trying to be boring like Disney. Some alternate history where they made a crazy hour-long jazz-filled feature, instead of Gulliver's Travels.
John, what do you think of David Hand's Animaland cartoons from the late 40s? I can't decide if I like them or not.
>>John, what do you think of David Hand's Animaland cartoons from the late 40s? I can't decide if I like them or not. <<
The animation is great. The designs are sometimes wonky and the stories are pretty boring.
Have you ever seen any of the old japanese rubber hose stuff , based on folk tales?
Japanese rubber hose, there ya go!
Ever heard of Shamus Culhane? He worked at Fleischer's in the early days, and later went to Disney. He wrote a book called Talking Animals and Other People. It's a great book to read, and he tells everyone what an asshole Walt Disney was.
-It IS a great book, one of the best. Too bad you've totally mischaracterized it here.
He ALSO tells everyone about how desperate he was to go work for the BEST studio in the world at the time, Disney's---that he drove 3,000 miles during the depression ( no superhighways then) with his wife and MIL in a crummy car without a guarantee of a job, and accepted 50 bucks a week(about 100 less than he had been making)just for the opportunity to work with Walt, that "asshole" and on Disney animation as an IN BETWEENER, rather than stay in NYC where he'd been a director. What does that tell you? How about Walt(who by then was a pretty important Hollywood producer)seeing him on the spot without an appointment, simply as a courtesy to an animator who'd come from New York and whose work he'd noticed and admired in those "inferior" cartoons he was supposedly too "square" to look at?
Or Shamus declaringtruthfully)that the best work of his career was acheived at the Disney studio, working for Norm Ferguson and on "Snow White" and "Pinocchio"? And how angry and itter he was that due to a misunderstanding about a tooth infection, he quite Disney's and moved to the much inferior Fleischer studio in Florida--how about those anectodes? Did you really read the book?
I think Culhane would be furious, Shawn, if he saw you take his thoughts out of context to bolster some argument about what an "asshole" Disney was--a word he never used, and a sentiment he actually didn't have at all. Difficult, yes, but also a genius. jesus.
John, I've never seen Tin Pan Alley Cats! You basically saved me! I'm so glad I'm finding all of these musical cartoons and everything makes sense how Clampett was the best cartoon director from Warners. I'm overwhelmed from getting so much cartoon knowledge from you, Steve Worth and other cartoon/animation people. I'm so damn happy! Thanks so much, man! you're one of my heroes!
Pedro Vargas!
I always picture John K. as a little old man when I watch his cartoons. Its shocking to see how young he is in real life. Nicolodeon animators are pretty young, too.
Now that I went to the cartoon history link I see why I thought that - the old school animators were old school! My favorite cartoons from back in the day were the ones that had caricatures of famous people, like, in a nightclub or something. I didn't even know who they were in the day, but I loved them.
To say cartoons were "stick figures" before 1928 is to ignore the great work of cartoonist Winsor McCay.
Check out this cartoon from 1911:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=seOGEwx0NfQ&search=winsor%20mccay
Nobody made animation that good for years to come. He hand-colored it, no less! Also check out Gertie the Dinosaur and the Sinking of the Lucitania. Great, early animation!
... oops, I meant to say:
"I didn't even know who they were at that age, but I loved them." You could see the actor's personality come through in the cartoon.
WHAT VIDEO CLIPS WERE POSTED.
Anonymous also forgot to mention how arrogant Disney was, and how much crap he talked about Fleischer's studio, and how he made Culhane forget everything he learned at Fleischer's so he could do more realistic/uncartoony animation.
Also, Culhane did groundbreaking animation in specific scenes of Pinochio, which apparently got rave reviews. But since Culhane had to leave Disney (his doctor told him to move to better climate because Culhane was suffering sever pain from a bad tooth), Disney threw a fit like a huge baby, and Culhane's name never appeared on the credit's for the animation HE created.
John , you should package all this not as a dead tree book per se but as a multimedia presentation on DVD, w