data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22c3e/22c3e9fa7fe8403e494092caf8423e4eba2d7c1e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31610/316109694cdb30ca8b3efd1ef63a0087e4505da4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/312b3/312b3e6b06a0ddf9b161b721b78edbb828bf82fc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e36/26e369891d3c53bbf8880a2a7501235fb18bd5b6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fe63/5fe63aefeed818600cf69498bd88548cbaec9940" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94b3e/94b3e11097284072ae2cb15423c3bf803ac0ffd9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abb2e/abb2e3a41651e764a1b63a93a2a711634a3bd4d5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd66f/bd66f15e90b1e1624b636d734c991e1bade9a273" alt=""
Milt Gross, Harvey Kurtzman, Geo. Herriman all did brilliant work, but never created strong characters that the public could latch on to. Segar, a lesser draftsman than all mentioned created Popeye, Olive Oyl, Wimpy, Bluto and a host of interesting characters who could carry long stories and many stories. That's the key. He has drawing skill for sure, but is not as adventurous visually as the other guys.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96099/960992b4fd9bbccf210f4ba596bd4ca11efa15b7" alt=""
The Flintstones were such strong and distinct characters on TV, that they didn't need to be executed brilliantly in order to last 3 decades. A mere 6 seasons were played over and over again forever because the public got the characters. They seemed like real folks and people like to hang around with characters more than with geniuses. Same thing can probably be said about Peanuts. Or the Simpsons. I've never thought much of the meandering stories and weak gags in the Simpsons, but I sort of understand how the public got used to the characters through sheer exposure. It's on 12 times a day. It eventually became like visiting your neighbors and befriending them. Even if your neighbors are boring, they are easily accessible and recognizable, so you enjoy their company through familiarity and habit.
Tex Avery on the other hand is an obvious genius, an innovator and very funny, but he never achieved the popularity of the Warner Bros. characters or even Tom and Jerry, who are barely characters at all - but at least they never go away. People got used to T&J because it's all Bill and Joe made for almost 20 years. Tex never settled on any strong characters and it robbed him of the acclaim and riches his greater talent deserved.
The Flintstones comics weren't funny and didn't match the show concept exactly, but were stylish enough to look at and our already strong familiarity of the likeable TV characters made us enjoy the strip version - at least until it got too influenced by late 60s comic strip styles and no longer had any resemblance to the Flintstones.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79541/795411c9784d1d43793e9b4786cbfba0018d40ad" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f3fe/7f3fe8d2e053115c6360126153686b386dad8f4e" alt=""
I like Clampett because he gives us everything - fantastic characters and funny stories with great execution.
Hey do me a favor, willya? Type in "Clampett" in that Ligit search slot at the upper right of the blog and see what happens. I'm doing a test.
http://comicrazys.com/2009/10/23/the-flintstones-sundays-1965-1966-dick-bickenbach/